1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the instant disposition

A. On September 12, 2005, while being employed as an employee of the workers in the spring industry, the Plaintiff filed an application for medical care benefits by suffering from injury, such as brain, due to an accident that meets the rear part of the rear part of the right pipe at the construction site of a warehouse in the Madern Industry, and filed an application for medical care benefits with the applicant suffering from cerebral fever, thalinosis, salinitis, salinitis, and stress disorder (in the following cases, hereinafter the same shall apply). The Plaintiff received medical care according to the decision on the approval of medical care on December 31, 2007 and received class 12 disability rating.

B. The Plaintiff asserts that all kinds of physical and mental disorder have occurred even after the completion of medical care. On June 26, 2013, the Plaintiff’s additional medical care for stress disorder on June 24, 2013, and additional medical care for stress disorder on June 24, 2013.

On July 16, 2013, the defendant filed an application for additional medical care, but the defendant did not comply with the criteria for recognition of additional medical care (the disposition in this case is conducted under the following).

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4, Eul evidence No. 1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination on the legitimacy of the disposition

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion continues to provide various emotional symptoms, such as physical symptoms, apprehensions, depression, and beautism, even after treatment is closed, and continuous treatment is required.

Nevertheless, the Defendant’s additional statement on the ground that the additional medical care does not meet the requirements for additional medical care without recognizing the causal link between the previous approval and the previous medical care.

The disposition of this case, which did not approve the application for additional medical care, was unlawful.

B. (1) Determination (1) Article 49 of the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act (Application for medical care benefits for an additional injury or disease): Injury or injury where a worker receiving medical care due to an occupational accident falls under any of the following: