1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Details of the disposition

On June 17, 2013, while working for B (hereinafter “Nonindicted Company”), the Plaintiff was diagnosed as having been on June 21, 2013 as having been on the part of the Plaintiff’s neck away from the gambling room that was loaded on the top of the line from the warehouse in the non-party company, and was diagnosed as having been on the part of the Plaintiff’s straw up, and was diagnosed as having been on the part of the Plaintiff’s straw up for an accident at which the Plaintiff’s right side is 5 balance (hereinafter “the instant accident”).

While the Plaintiff was receiving the approval of the medical care from the Defendant due to the instant injury and disease, the Plaintiff was additionally diagnosed as “the 4-5 light signboard escape certificate (hereinafter “the 4-5 light signboard escape certificate”)” and applied for medical care for the instant injury and disease to the Defendant.

On August 5, 2013, the Defendant was unable to accept the Plaintiff’s application for medical care on the ground that it is difficult for the Plaintiff to recognize the causal relationship between the Plaintiff’s work and the Plaintiff’s work on the instant application, on the ground that the Plaintiff had the ability to receive treatment for the light fluoral base in the past, and that it is judged that it was fluoral fluoral disease

(hereinafter “instant disposition”). The Plaintiff dissatisfied with the instant disposition and filed a request for an examination with the president of the Korea Workers’ Compensation & Welfare Service, but was dismissed on December 2013. The Plaintiff filed a request for reexamination with the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Reexamination Committee, but was dismissed on May 16, 2014.

[Ground of recognition] The plaintiff's assertion of legitimacy of the disposition of this case as a whole, including Gap evidence 1, Eul evidence 1, Eul evidence 1, Eul evidence 2, 3, and 4, and the purport of the whole oral argument, is legitimate. The plaintiff's allegation of legitimacy of the disposition of this case is that the accident of this case occurred due to the accident of this case or becomes worse due to natural progress, but the disposition of

In fact, the Plaintiff’s medical treatment progress and the details of the receipt of insurance benefits were received as the instant approved injury and disease for a total of 467 days from June 21, 2013 to September 30, 2014.

Health insurance for the plaintiff.