logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 경주지원 2014.01.16 2013고단332
도로법위반
Text

The defendant is innocent.

Reasons

The summary of the facts charged in this case is that the employee A violated the restrictions on the operation of vehicles of the road management authority by loading and operating the freight to exceed the limit limit limit on B vehicles on the street access roads to Danyang Highway around September 14, 1993, around September 21, 1993, by the employee A of the defendant.

Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4545 of Mar. 10, 1993, and amended by Act No. 4920 of Jan. 5, 1995), which is a applicable provision to the above charged facts, was retroactively invalidated according to the Constitutional Court's decision of unconstitutionality as of December 29, 201.

Thus, the facts charged in this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime and thus, the defendant is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow