1. Defendant AC shall make each of the money recorded in the claim amount column of attached Table 2-1 to each Plaintiff listed in attached Table 2-1, as well as the money.

1. Determination as to the plaintiffs' claims against defendant AC

(a)as shown in the reasons for the attachment of the claim;

[However, the date of defraudation in attached Table 2-2 of the cause of the claim shall be as shown in attached Table 2-1 "the date before one day from each day in the column of the base date of the attached Table 2-1" and the amount of defraudation in attached Table 2-2 shall be as listed in attached Table 2-1 "the amount of money listed in the column of the claim amount in attached Table 2-1".

Judgment by deeming the confession based on recognition (Article 208 (3) 2 of the Civil Procedure Act)

2. Determination as to the plaintiffs' claims against defendant AD in the attached Table 3

A. Defendant AD’s assertion 1) does not have the intent or ability to guarantee the principal, profit, or agreed vehicle even if it is invested in money, and is a way to return the principal to the Plaintiffs listed in the attached Table 3 at the agreed date and time when it invests a specific amount of money for a long time. It is the way to make an investment in a certain amount of money for a short term re-examination at the same time to pay the agreed principal and agreed profit. It is the way to give the vehicle agreed upon at the time when it is invested in a certain amount of money for a short term re-examination. It is the way to give the vehicle to be provided with the agreed time when it is invested in a certain amount of money for a short term re-examination, or to make the ambal vehicle. In the way of investing the money in a manner, it is deceiving the said Plaintiffs to guarantee the principal, profit, or agreed vehicle, by receiving the money indicated in the attached Table 3 remittance column from

(2) As a joint tortfeasor of the instant fraud, Defendant AD is liable for damages equivalent to the amount obtained by deceit to Defendant AC and each of the above plaintiffs as the joint tortfeasor of the instant fraud (However, the above plaintiffs seek payment of each money indicated in the column for claim amount of attached Table 3 corresponding to 30% of the amount acquired by deceit as a partial claim.

(2) Even if Defendant D actively participated in the instant fraud, or did not conspired with Defendant AC.

Even if Defendant AD violated the Electronic Financial Transactions Act, Defendant AD.