Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 01:10 on May 6, 2014, the Defendant insultd the victim by openly insulting the victim by putting the victim’s Da (the 49 years of age) who is a taxi engineer and the police officer who was patroled at the time, “humb wum wum wum wum wum wum wum wum wum wum wum wum wum wum wum wum wum wum wum wum wum wum wum w

2. On May 6, 2014, the Defendant: (a) 01:20, at the same place; and (b) E and F, a police official belonging to the Seoul Geumcheon Police Station D District District, who was patroled at the same place, intended to arrest the Defendant as a flagrant offender in the crime of insult; (c) expressed a bath to the said E, such as “a flob flob flob flobs. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f.

As a result, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties of police officers on crime prevention and maintenance of order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of C and E;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Selection of selective fine for punishment (to take into account the favorable circumstances among the following reasons for sentencing):

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The sentencing guidelines are not applicable according to the choice of a fine on the grounds of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act. While there are unfavorable circumstances such as the need for strict punishment for the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties in order to establish the State’s legal order and eradicate the light of public authority, and the Defendant committed an insulting crime in addition to the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties, the Defendant has committed an insulting crime. However, the Defendant is in depth in the confession of each of the crimes of this case, and the Defendant has no same criminal record and is subject to special criminal punishment except for the Defendant who has been punished twice with respect to driving of the vehicle.