logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2016.08.26 2015고단1839
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2015 Highest 1839"

1. On January 2015, the Defendant called the victim C by phoneing it to the victim C, “A used vehicle business employee D, E, intended to purchase a used vehicle, will offer a car as security and repay a loan.

“False speech was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, the defendant was absent from office at the time, and even if he received a loan from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to provide a motor vehicle as security or to repay the loan, because he borrowed the name of D or E for the purpose of paying his personal debt with the intention of purchasing a motor vehicle from the beginning or offering it as security.

Around January 30, 2015, the Defendant deceiving the victim as above, and caused the victim to transfer KRW 18.5 million to the Daegu Bank Account in the name of D as a collateral loan for automobiles, and around February 18:15, 2015, KRW 24 million to the Daegu Bank Account in the name of E, respectively.

"2015 Highest 2176"

2. On September 2014, 2014, the Defendant: “The Defendant is carrying on a financial business on behalf of a used vehicle off at a high school and a friend site; it is difficult for the Defendant to enter the company due to the fact that the purchase of a motor vehicle was low due to the lack of mechanisms games.

If the loan is lent to B with a installment loan in four names, it is necessary to purchase a vehicle at a discount, sell it to others within one month, raise the performance of the loan to others, and pay the installment to the lending company in full, so that it does not cause any damage to width.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, as the Defendant had a large personal debt so that it was impossible to lend money under the name of the Defendant, the Defendant received a loan under another person’s name and got back the Defendant’s obligation, and the Defendant was planned to use the money borrowed from the victim to repay other debts, and thus, the Defendant’s loan under the name of the victim is fully paid.

arrow