1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The forest survey report prepared with respect to the G of the Gyeonggi-do head-gun-gun in the Japanese occupation period is registered as H as the owner of “F forest 1-4 mar-9”, and his address is a disturbance.

B. On January 1, 1978, the land indicated in paragraph (a) was registered by converting it into a square meter, and became “1477 square meters of Gyeonggi-do, Socheon-gun, Gyeonggi-do.”

In addition, on December 26, 1978, I was divided into the land converted and registered, J on January 11, 2002, and K on November 30, 2007, and the land converted and registered was “7,836 square meters of forest land in Gyeonggi-do, Gyeonggi-do (the forest land in this case).”

C. Defendant B completed the registration of initial ownership on August 24, 198 pursuant to Act No. 3627 (Act No. 3627 on Special Measures for Restoration and Preservation of Unclaimed Land, etc. in a Diplomatic Areas) with respect to the forest of this case (i.e., forest land before division, it is 14,612 square meters in F forest).

On June 28, 2002, Defendant B completed the registration of ownership transfer on the ground of Defendant C and Nonparty L’s donation on June 24, 2002 with respect to one half of the forest of this case.

E. On December 29, 2006, Nonparty L completed the registration of ownership transfer on the ground of sale dated December 22, 2006, with respect to the portion of 991/827 out of the forest land of this case.

F. Defendant D, as a co-owned property partition on February 26, 2008, completed the registration of each transfer in the name of Nonparty D, respectively, among the 991/827 shares, 432.8 shares in Defendant C, 58.2/827 shares in the non-party L.

G. On June 25, 2013, Defendant E transferred 39807/8270 of the instant forest land from Nonparty L, on the ground of legacy on June 25, 2010.

[Ground of recognition] Evidence No. 1, Evidence No. 2-1 to 3, Evidence No. 3-1, and 2-2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the cause of claim

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion that the forest land of this case was the land under the circumstances of the Plaintiff’s father, H, who was the father of the Plaintiff. On August 7, 1927, H succeeded to the property solely by M, who is the father of the Plaintiff, and subsequently M, died on October 13, 1970.