logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2018.02.08 2015가단54719
채무부존재확인
Text

1. The Plaintiff’s obligation to compensate the Defendant for damages is KRW 9,132,167, relating to the treatment of the Plaintiff’s attached list with respect to the Defendant.

Reasons

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. A. At around 10:00 on April 15, 2015, the Plaintiff administered a so-called so-called so-called so-called so-called so-called so-called so-called so-called dicoscinosis, which may cause side effects, such as kneeing, to the Defendant who was in charge of treating kneeing, at the D So-si branch located in the Plaintiff’s president. 2) The Plaintiff, a patient first treated, without confirming the past disease history, such as whether the Plaintiff had caused side effects, such as alpheing, etc., to the Defendant, who was the patient first treated, caused the so-called so-called so-called so-called so-called dicoscin shock to the Defendant, who has the al parte body of the said drugs.

In an emergency situation, in order to treat an Abiomanine shock, he/she must normally infinite finite, and the plaintiff did not infinite finite finite finite.

3. The Plaintiff transferred the Defendant to the Mine University Hospital, and the Defendant re-exploited the heart after cardiopulmonary resuscitation at the Design University Hospital.

The defendant, on the grounds of brain damage, brain disorder, and adaptation disorder caused by a physical disease, mental division, etc., at the hospital of the original university from April 15, 2015 to April 30, 2015, and from May 1, 2015.

5. From May 8, 2015 to June 5, 2015, a person was discharged from a military hospital by being transferred to the next oriental medical hospital at a general hospital, and transferred to the next oriental medical hospital at the college of oriental medicine.

[Ground for recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 11 (including each number, if the number is included; hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 11, and the purport of the whole pleadings

B. The Plaintiff’s duty to compensate for damages may cause side effects by ascertaining the history of the past, such as whether the victim, who was the patient first treated prior to administering the said drug, caused side effects, such as alphar, etc., of the specific drug.

arrow