logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.11.24 2016고정2819
정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is a person using the “E” from the NAV carpet “D,” and the victim F claimed that the NA had a pain by side effects after undergoing the Mabomic surgery from the Mabomic surgery located in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, and posted his arguments, face pictures, etc. on the Kapet.

On April 5, 2016, the Defendant had access to the above car page, and published a false statement on the above bulletin board, stating, “I am to see if I am to am to am to am to the hospital with her fingerprints affixed on his own, and then I am to am to em to am to em to em to am to em to am to em to am to em to am to am to em to am to am to am to am to am to am to am to am to am to am to am to am to am to am

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by exposing public false information through the information and communication network for the purpose of slandering the person.

2. Determination

(a) Crimes of non-compliance: Article 70 (3) of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc.;

B. On October 21, 2016, after the indictment of this case, submission of a statement of withdrawal of complaint that the victim F does not want punishment against the defendant

(c) Judgment dismissing public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;

arrow