The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (one year and two months of imprisonment and four months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below is that each of the crimes of this case committed by the defendant, who used and smokes softphones and marijuana for several times, is extremely poor in the quality of the crime. Narcotics crimes are highly harmful to society due to smuggling, toxicity, possibility of linking with other crimes, etc., and the defendant was sentenced to the suspension of the execution for six months on June 3, 2016 by imprisonment with prison labor for a crime of violation of the Narcotics Control Act at the Jung-gu District Court on June 13, 2016, and was sentenced to the suspension of the execution for six months on June 13, 2016 without being aware of the fact that the judgment became final and conclusive on June 13, 2016, and committed each of the crimes in the same case as the judgment of the court below in the same case.

Meanwhile, all of the crimes of this case are favorable to the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant recognized each of the crimes of this case and reflects his mistake, that the defendant appears to have cooperated with the police's investigation, and that each of the crimes of this case 2016 Gohap 283 decided in the original judgment is in the relation of concurrent crimes with the violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. (fence) in the judgment of the court below and the group after Article 37 of the Criminal Act.

위와 같은 사정들과 그 밖에 피고인의 나이, 성 행, 환경, 범행의 동기, 수단과 결과, 범행 후의 정황 등 변론에 나타난 모든 양형조건 및 대법원 양형 위원회 제정 양형기준의 권고 형량 범위 ◈ 법률상 처단형의 범위 원심 판시 2016 고합 184호 사건: 징역 1년 ~ 45년 원심 판시 2016 고합 283호 사건: 징역 1월 ~ 15년 ◈ 양형기준상 권고 형의 범위 원심 판시 2016 고합 184호 사건 - 기본범죄: 허브 마약 사용으로 인한 마약류 관리에 관한 법률위반( 향 정) 죄 [ 유형의 결정] 마약범죄 군 > 투약 ㆍ 단순 소지 등 >...