1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. Basic facts

A. From around 2003 to 200, the Plaintiff operated a private teaching institute (hereinafter “the instant private teaching institute”) under the trade name “EA” in Seoul Seocho-gu Seoul Building D, and concluded a partnership agreement between the Defendant and the Defendant on January 2005, stating that “the Plaintiff transferred 1/2 of the shares of the instant private teaching institute to the Defendant for KRW 160 million, and the Defendant received monthly salary of KRW 3 million, and the Plaintiff and the Defendant distributed 1/2 of the net profits, excluding rents, salaries to the Defendant and employees, and other expenses, from the gross income of the private teaching institute.”

(hereinafter referred to as “instant trade agreement”). (b)

From around November 2015, the Plaintiff was not involved in the operation of the instant private teaching institute since 2006, and requested the Defendant to settle the revenue of the instant private teaching institute on or around November 2015. As part of the settlement amount, the Defendant paid to the Plaintiff KRW 10 million on July 7, 2015, KRW 15 million on December 7, 2015, KRW 45 million on December 8, 2015, KRW 70, KRW 700 on December 7, 2015, KRW 70 on December 7, 2015, KRW 3,790,000 on December 7, 2015, KRW 70 on a total of KRW 70,000 on a deposit basis, KRW 327,07,00 on December 4, 2016, KRW 70 on a deposit basis, KRW 70,000 on a deposit basis, KRW 205,2016.

C. On January 12, 2016, the Plaintiff filed the instant lawsuit seeking the payment of the revenue settlement amount of the instant private teaching institute. On March 4, 2016, a duplicate of the instant complaint was served on the Defendant on March 11, 2016, and agreed with the Defendant as follows.

(hereinafter “instant agreement”). The Plaintiff and the Defendant, upon termination of the instant agreement, promise to terminate the instant private teaching institute as of March 4, 2016, are both parties to the instant agreement.

After all, the plaintiff is irrelevant to the income and management of the above Institute, and transfers the plaintiff's share 1/2 to the defendant.

The defendant shall pay 215 million won to the plaintiff, including the daily deposit of 200 million won.

The amount of retirement settlement shall be settled en bloc by the defendant.

later, the Office of Education;