logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2014.05.01 2014고정356
화물자동차운수사업법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the owner of D5 tons of cargo vehicles, a private truck, who operates an article center in Daejeon Jung-gu as "C" in the name of "C".

The owner or user of a private-use truck shall not provide or lease such private-use truck commercially for transport purposes.

On November 29, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around 17:27, the Seo-gu Daejeon apartment 304, the Defendant provided the private-use truck for the purpose of transportation for profit by receiving KRW 400,000,00 for the expenses of the board of directors and freight in front of the 304-dong, Seo-gu, Daejeon apartment.

On October 23, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around 08:00, around the Daejeon Jung-gu, Daejeon, the F apartment 916, carried away from the person who requested the above cargo lane to G apartment in the Jung-gu, Daejeon, and (b) received KRW 600,000 as the expenses for directors and provided private-use truck for cargo transport at a cost.

Summary of Evidence

"2014, 356"

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A H statement;

1. Control photographs "2014, 478";

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A report on investigation;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, and the choice of fines under Articles 67 subparagraph 5 and 56 of the Trucking Transport Business Act, and the choice of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which has been punished several times for the same kind of crime, does not seem to have been shown even if the defendant committed the instant crime.

However, the defendant is led to confession and is in depth against himself.

In this context, considering all the circumstances such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, and circumstances after the crime, the punishment is determined as ordered.

arrow