Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year and for six months, respectively.

However, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants, on March 9, 2017, 09:30 on March 9, 2017, f.h. H. H. H. H.F. c.

At the time, there is a risk of spreading a forest fire in a very strong wind, so people entering a forest shall not smoke from a cigarette at the place of origin, and when smoking a cigarette, a thorough examination of whether the cigarette butts completely take the cigarette out, as well as a duty of care to prevent forest fire by checking whether a person entering a forest can not smoked from a cigarette or completely cut the cigarette cigarette cigarette smoked by a accompanying accompanying accompanying accompanying accompanying accompanying accompanying accompanying accompanying accompanying accompanying accompanying accompanying accompanying accompanying accompanying accompanying accompanyingr is also obligated to prevent forest fire in advance.

Nevertheless, there was no fact that the Defendants knew that they possess tobacco between themselves, but they did not have any tobacco nor prevented them from smoking, and Defendant A was negligent by not properly extinguishing the cigarette in the above place after smoking the cigarette, and Defendant B was negligent in neglecting the other party’s cigarette smoke without closely checking whether the cigarette cigarette was completely cut out of the early cigarette but the other party appeared, and Defendant B was negligent in neglecting the other party’s cigarette smoke without thoroughly checking whether the cigarette cigarette was cut out of the early cigarette but the cigarette was cut out by wind. Defendant A was 244 h of forests and fields within H, which is owned by Gangnam-si, which is the possession of G, which is the possession of the cigarette of the early cigarette but the cigarette of which is moved to a forest by wind, thereby causing damage equivalent to KRW 90,00,00 for forest restoration expenses.

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly put the public in danger by burning another's forest by negligence as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant A's partial statement

1. Statement made by the defendant B in the first trial record;

1. The legal statement of the witness B (as to the defendant A)

1. Each police statement in relation to I, J, K, L, M, N,O, and P;

1. A report on the occurrence of a fire, and a report on the situation (No. 1 to No. 8);

1. Each internal investigation report and investigation report (the attachment, etc. of CCTV CCTVs at the H village, which is a forest fire site);

1. Investigation, etc. of damage caused by forest fires;