1. The Defendant each indicated in the attached Form 17, 18, 19, 20, 17 among the 3-story of buildings listed in the attached Table 3389.12 square meters to the Plaintiff.

According to the purport of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 11 and the whole pleadings, the plaintiff is obligated to deliver to the plaintiff who exercises the right to manage and operate the building from September 2, 2016 to the entrustment of Seoul Special Metropolitan City, which is the owner of the building indicated in the attached list. Among the attached list, the period of free use permission for the portion indicated "ma" in the attached Form No. 17, 18, 19, 20, and 17, which is owned by the defendant, was terminated on September 1, 2016, and the right to occupy it is not visible to the defendant. Thus, the defendant is obligated to deliver it to the plaintiff by subrogation, who exercises the right to claim for the return of ownership in the attached list.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified, and it is so decided as per Disposition.