A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

At around 10:30 on August 26, 2013, the Defendant, who is engaged in the business of driving CNEW franchise-XG automobiles, was negligent in performing the duty of care to show the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and right and the right are exercised.

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. A written statement of the occurrence of each traffic accident by a defendant or D;

1. A traffic accident report (1) (2);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1) of the relevant Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. As to the Defendant’s assertion of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the Defendant asserts that there was no negligence on the occurrence of the instant accident.

The following circumstances, which can be recognized by the above evidence, namely, the intersection of the private distance in which the accident of this case occurred, is an intersection where the traffic is not controlled, and the roads passing by the defendant are one-lane roads, and the roads passing by the defendant are two-lane roads which meet the automobiles of the defendant, as roads crossing with the above roads. The accident of this case occurred in the center of the private distance. The accident of this case occurred in the central part of the private distance. The defendant's accident of this case.