logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2015.06.30 2014고단2636
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Criminal facts

In the Suwon District Court's Ansan Branch, the defendant has the penal power to punish the violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) as a crime, a fine of one million won on December 4, 2006, and a fine of 1.5 million won on February 29, 2008.

On July 14, 2014, the Defendant driven a G car under the influence of alcohol at 0.187% with a blood alcohol concentration at 02:20%, and proceeded to the same side of the head of the Dong-dong of the same Gu at the Dammmmmmb, Ansan City, as one-lane of the three-lanes in front of the Gmbaeng-gu, Seosan City, Ansan City, the Defendant changed the lanes to the two-lane.

In such cases, when a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle changes the vehicle line, he/she has a duty of care to change the vehicle line by operating the direction direction, etc., giving prior notice of change of course, and taking into account the traffic situation of the front and rear left.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and caused the collision between the left part of the victim H driver's I driver's driver's first left part of the victim's driver's driver's driver's driving, who was driving in two lanes due to the negligence of the Defendant's driver's negligence.

At the same time, the Defendant got injured by the victim J, who was on board the above Ha and the above Ha driving vehicle due to occupational negligence, for approximately two weeks of injury, such as salt, tension, etc. in need of medical treatment, and, at the same time, went away without taking necessary measures, such as immediately stopping the vehicle to ensure that the above I vehicle repair cost is KRW 5 million, and thus, the victims were saved.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's partial statement and his defense counsel did not appear to have taken measures under the Road Traffic Act as the defendant at the time of the traffic accident, and even if necessary.

Even if the necessary measures under the Road Traffic Act were withdrawn, it is not the escape.

Whether an accident driver actually needs to take measures such as aiding a victim, etc. is the details and details of the accident.

arrow