The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

On June 15, 2020, the Defendant revised the facts charged at C factory offices located in Spocheon-si B around 18:57 on June 15, 2020, as described above, the Victim D (M, 35 years of age) who was a previous relationship.

B. Along with the fact that this teaching system was interrupted and not contacted, the message of sexual dialogue, which was divided before the victim, was partially attached to the message of the sexual conversation that “I had no yet been known, and the number of a radsing match number was changed and cut off.”

어떻게 애기를 해 놨는지는 모르겠지만 우리의 이야기 중 아주 일부분이고 사소한 부분부터 다 밝혀 줄게.

In the end, I would like to send the number to the victim with an identification number, but I would expect that I would see this behavior by machine from which I would see it as money only in the governance day. I would like to transmit to the victim the Kakakao Stockholm message with a part of the message of sexual dialogue that was divided into before the victim for the same reason at the same place on June 18, 2020, and then at the same place on June 20:24, 2020, together with a part of the message of sexual conversation that was divided with the victim for the same reason.

I am to see that there is a need to see the fields of conversation, such as good-satis, if any.

“The Kakao Stockholm message sent to the victim, thereby threatening the victim.

2. Determination

(a) Crimes of non-violation of intention: Article 283 (3) of the Criminal Act;

(b) The victim shall express his/her intention not to punish him/her after prosecution;

(c) Judgment dismissing a public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;