logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2016.09.30 2015나11749
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. The following facts are either a dispute between the parties or a record.

The Plaintiff filed the instant lawsuit claiming damages against the Defendant on March 11, 2015, stating the Defendant’s address “Seouldong-gu Seouldong-gu C apartment, 404 Dong-dong, 304, Dong-dong, 304,” which is the Defendant’s domicile.

B. On March 24, 2015, the court of first instance served each copy of the complaint, the litigation guide, and the written summary of the response with the defendant’s domicile, and the notice of service by mail is written that D, the defendant’s female, as the defendant’s cohabitant, received each of the above documents.

C. On June 11, 2015, the court of first instance served a notice of the sentencing date on the defendant as the domicile of the defendant, and the notice of postal service is written that E, the defendant's mother, received the notice of the sentencing date.

On June 26, 2015, the court of the first instance rendered a judgment accepting the plaintiff's claim, and served the original copy of the judgment against the defendant as the domicile of the defendant.

On July 1, 2015, the notice of postal service is written to be received as the defendant's live-in partner.

E. Since then, the Defendant filed a subsequent appeal on October 2, 2015.

2. Judgment on the legitimacy of the appeal subsequent to the subsequent completion of this case

A. The defendant's assertion 1) frequents the point of view that the defendant's home was unsatisfy due to local business trips, etc., and the defendant seems to have disposed of the defendant's home after receiving the original copy of the judgment of the first instance court of this case between the defendant's home and the defendant's home, and judged that E was merely a general mail after receiving the original copy of the judgment of the first instance court of this case. However, E is a large and old door, and there is no ability to separate the letter of complaint of this case. In addition, the copy, etc. of the complaint of this case is the receipt of D. However, D residing at the defendant's domicile together with E is not capable

3) If so, the above judgment will be delivered lawfully.

arrow