Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for ten years and for seven years, respectively.

Sexual assault against the Defendants for 100 hours each.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

In addition, the petitioner for attachment order (hereinafter “defendant”) A and Defendant B were hedginged while making a teaching system and they were married separately. Since January 19, 2009, Defendant B got divorced on or around January 19, 2009, Defendant B was in an internal relationship with Defendant A again and became in an internal relationship with Defendant A. The victim E (here, 15 years old) was a father, and the victim was a father between Defendant B and the former husband. However, the mother was living together with his father, but the mother was able to contact with Defendant B and consult about his own mind.

1. The Defendants’ joint criminal conduct had the mind that the victim was able to have sexual intercourses with the victim by taking advantage of the fact that the victim was well aware of his/her speech and well-known his/her situation, and the Defendant A knew all of the above circumstances and consented thereto.

around 04:00 on May 3, 2013, Defendant B contacted the victim who completed school lessons at around 14:00 on May 2, 2013, Defendant B called “the victim, who is satisfy, satisfy, satfy, satfy, and satisfy,” and called “the victim, who was living together with the victim, satfy in the Gumi CityF,” and “the victim, who had a good appraisal to Defendant A, satisfy in his refusal to do so,” and Defendant B called “the victim, who was satisfy by being fyed off and satd.,” and Defendant B called “the victim, who was not aware of the second floor of the 2nd floor of the 2nd floor of the 2nd floor of the 2nd apartment.”

Defendant

B introduced the Defendant A, who was accommodated in advance at the victim, to the effect that the victim “to be placed on the bed, such as A C,” and “to be taken once on the bed on the bed,” and the victim’s refusal to do so.