The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Defendant 1) In fact, the Defendant was delegated the authority to dispose of each of the instant land by H and I, the president of the clan, who is the head of the clan, so there was no intention to commit fraud.

2) The sentence of the lower court’s improper sentencing (two years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

B. The Prosecutor’s sentence of the lower court is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The court below correctly adopted and examined the assertion of fact, and stated that the following circumstances are consistent from the investigative agency to the court of the court below, namely, ① it delegated the authority necessary to search for the clan property, etc. sold at will by X, and there is no authority to trade the land owned by the clan. ② The defendant made the defendant to arbitrarily prepare and display "the above services and agreement" in his/her name, and did not have any authority to trade the land possessed by the clan nor delegate his/her authority to trade the land possessed by the clan." The defendant himself/herself also recognized that "I prepared I's name "the above services and agreement" in his/her name, and he/she did not have the authority to trade the land in his/her name, and the defendant did not have the authority to sell the land in his/her name, although he/she did not know that there was no authority to sell the land in his/her name," the defendant's statement that "I did not have the authority to sell it," and the defendant's statement that he/she had no authority to do so."