logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.12.13 2017나19721
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On July 10, 2014, the Defendant, a manager of the CF, concluded a business agreement with the Plaintiff, the representative of HF Korea, (MU; hereinafter “instant business agreement”), and H Korea decided to actively cooperate as a partner of CF Korea (hereinafter “CF”), and decided to separately consult on the specific method of cooperation between the Plaintiff and the Defendant.

[Details of Collaborationed Implementation]

3.In the case of Egys (I), I will make sure that:

1) C Organizing Committee’s director or winner’s appointment 2) C Korea 2014 Special PPL film insertion (at the time of production of e-mail broadcasting, e-mail, e-mail film production) C Korea 2014 e-mail, VIP invitation 4) C Korea 2014 e-mail screen support 5) C&2014 e-mail participants’ portrait right provision (for two years of agreement).

B. While discussing a separate co-op agreement with the Defendant and H Korea regarding the specific method of cooperation under the instant Work Convention, the Defendant, upon the Plaintiff’s request on September 2014, concluded a co-op agreement (hereinafter “instant agreement”) with the Plaintiff as the representative (i) of brand D (hereinafter “D”) newly launched by the Plaintiff around August 2014. The Defendant, upon the Plaintiff’s request, sponsored D D Co., Ltd to C Co. organized by the Defendant; and the Defendant, upon the Defendant’s implementation of the following matters, concluded a co-op agreement (hereinafter “instant agreement”).

C. C Korea Korea 2014, hosted by the Defendant on October 10, 2014, was proceeded with in the state where all participants suffered Daehan provided by the Plaintiff, and such figures were broadcasted in the broadcast.

On the other hand, H Korea decided to provide a set when superior prizes of C Korea 2014 participate in the world conference.

E. On November 2014, the Defendant: (a) in the process of taking the propy photographs submitted by the top-tier winners of the early C Korea 2014 to the World Contest, on the ground that the dives offered by the Plaintiff did not meet the level of the World Contest.

arrow