beta
Text
Defendant
A In fines of KRW 3,00,000, KRW 2,000, KRW 2,000,000, KRW 3,000, Defendant C in fines of KRW 3,00,00.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. Defendant B was sentenced to the Seoul High Court Order 2008Na76695, 76701 (combined) which was brought by the Ham a religious organization I to leave on August 5, 2009 in the lawsuit, and the name of the building was also ordered by the Imp. In May 27, 2010, Supreme Court Decision 2009Da6765, 67672 (Joint) Decided May 27, 2010, the case number “2009Da1045577” as stated in the indictment is clearly a clerical error in the above statement, and thus the above correction is made.
The above judgment became final and conclusive.
Nevertheless, the Defendant, at around October 23, 2013, is in conflict with the pastor K, who is the manager of the I church in Songpa-gu Seoul, Songpa-gu, Seoul, constitutes a crime of intrusion on the building against the will of the manager on the ground that K prevents him from entering the wedding distribution. In light of the records, the Defendant merely stated an incidental circumstance to confirm the situation that the “in contravention of the above judgment” as stated in the facts charged is against the will of the manager, and it is obvious that this is against the will of the manager, and thus, the Defendant corrected it and corrected it as above.
The above church entered the distribution of the worship to the above church.
Accordingly, the defendant intruded on the building managed by others.
2. At around 20:40 on October 23, 2013, Defendants A, B, C, and D’s co-offenders of the above IE set forth the victim K(44 years of age) in the second floor distribution, and the members following them enter the above IE EM, Defendant A, and Defendant B are able to take a bath about the victim, display the victim several times of drinking to the victim, Defendant D is able to take the victim’s face by drinking. Defendant C was able to take the victim’s clothes in his hand, and Defendant C continued to take the victim’s clothes from the victim’s clothes to the part of the victim’s body. Defendant C, Defendant A, Defendant C, and Defendant D met with drinking and drinking to the victim.