logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2012.11.22 2012고단204
위증교사
Text

Defendant

B Imprisonment for six months and for eight months, each of the defendants A shall be punished by imprisonment.

, however, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A was sentenced to imprisonment with labor for a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. at the Incheon District Court on September 7, 2011, and was dismissed in the appellate court, and the appeal was final and conclusive on April 13, 2012 by the Supreme Court on the dismissal of the appeal.

Defendant

A is a follow-up distribution of E in custody for a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. (fence) and Defendant B is the denial of the above E.

The above A was prosecuted for the charge of selling philophones to F, which was known through the introduction of E, and first, the F was denied on August 18, 2009, and the record of the telephone content that confirmed the fact that the F was only due to the cell phone location tracking, etc., and that F would be able to ask for narcotics to F. When the record of the telephone content was submitted, the F knew B was able to request it as a witness in the trial.

1. Defendant A had Defendant A attend the case of violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. (fluence) at the Incheon District Court Decision 201No. 698, to the effect that “A had fencing a fencing f and a fencing fencing with a fencing fencing with a fencing with a f incencing with a f inc

On June 2, 201, the day immediately before the date of examination of witness, the defendant requested B to testify by showing the examination of witness prepared to the above purport from the office of the defendant attorney-at-law in Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City and making a practice in advance, and made B make a resolution of false testimony.

However, in fact, A did not know whether the contact and contact with F was made due to 2 million won upon A's request, and there was no fact that A made a flock to attract F.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, at the court of Incheon District Court No. 412 located in the Nam-gu Incheon District Court around 16:00 on June 3, 201, made the Defendant make a false testimony against memory as follows 2.

arrow