logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.11.12 2013가합503941
공유물분할
Text

1. Of the 7929m20m2 in Gyeonggi-do Kimpo-si;

(a) in sequence 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 1 of the Schedule 1.

Reasons

1. The principal lawsuit and counterclaim shall also be deemed to exist;

A. The ownership and possession relationship of 51192 square meters in Jan-si, Gyeonggi-do, Kimpo-si and Kimpo-si, Gyeonggi-do (hereinafter “instant land”). The Flu-si, Gyeonggi-do, Kimpo-si, and 7929 square meters in size (hereinafter “instant one”).

As to Plaintiff A, 7929/106 shares, Plaintiff B shares, 3470/79/79 shares, Defendant C shares, 1623/79/79/7929, and Defendant E shares, 1345/609/7929/79 (59/7929/79/79/7929/79/79/1345) of each co-owner’s shares, following the filing of the instant lawsuit, the share ratio as to the land of this case was equally adjusted. The share ratio as to the land of this case was as of April 9, 2014. Gyeonggi-do Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, Gyeonggi-do. The land of this case and the land of this case are 5192 square meters (hereinafter “2 land of this case”). All of the land of this case and the land of this case are “each land of this case”

(2) On March 23, 2006, Plaintiff A was a co-owner who owns each share of 28297/1063, Plaintiff B’s share of 5314/1067, and Defendant C’s share of 24860/100. The network K was a co-owner with the share of 2983/79/79 of the land of this case, but the above share was deceased on March 23, 2006, and Defendant D (the head of Defendant C) (the head of Defendant C) owned each share of 4,7,8,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15, 16, 17, 17, 17, 197, 205, 217, 204, 205, 207, 204, 205, 201.

3) The Plaintiffs and Defendant C, E, Selection G, H, and I did not reach an agreement on the division of each of the instant lands. (b) On March 4, 1987, Defendant D reported the hot spring discovery regarding the Ma (current N) at Kimpo-si in Gyeonggi-do, and on December 21, 1987, the said hot spring discovery report was accepted, and on July 15, 1989, the date was designated as the Opo-si hot spring district.

2) The net L (the spouse of the plaintiff A, the father of the plaintiff B and the defendant D agreed to operate the O Hot Spring Development Project and the following contents on October 26, 1987.

arrow