A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

However, the execution of imprisonment shall be suspended for four years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Around October 7, 2013, while the defendant was tried to repay his bonds he had borne, the victim E (the age of 28) who was hospitalized in the same room as a traffic accident in the Sungnam-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Sungnam-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City (Dawon 306) around October 7, 2013.

1. Robbery;

A. On October 7, 2013, at around 22:00, the Defendant made a false statement that the Defendant was a ethyl lux, containing psychotropic drug ingredients, to the victim, at the 306 room of D, the Defendant 18K gold galm equivalent to KRW 430,00,00 from the victim, and 18K gold galm equivalent to the market price was deducted from the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant took the victim's property by force.

B. On October 9, 2013, around 05:00, the Defendant: (a) laid the victim in the same manner as that of the preceding paragraph; (b) cut the victim’s 200,000 won and 30,000 won in cash at the market price of the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant took the victim's property by force.

2. Larceny;

A. On October 9, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around 13:35 on October 13, 2013; (b) around 306, the Defendant carried out a bit bargaining 50,000 won of the market price set up in the victim’s locking room between the victim and the outing room.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the victim's property.

B. On October 10, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around 20:30 on October 10, 2013, the Victim’s husband F, who parked on the road near the Sinnam-si Hegic Schillic Schillic Station, left the victim and F, with a line of 180,000 won equivalent to the market price of the victim’s her husband F, who was taking the place of diving, in front of the head of Schilling.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the victim's property.

3. The Defendant is not a person handling narcotics, etc.

The defendant is set forth in paragraph 1-A.

at the time and place mentioned in paragraph 1(a).

As described in the port, E made ethyl 1, which contains psychotropic drug ingredients, ethyl lux, into luta.

Accordingly, the defendant is a strokem.