logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2017.08.30 2017고단646
사기방조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2017 Highest 646"

1. On December 7, 2016, a person who is not the name of the organization of the organization that committed the fraud of a person who was not the name of the person who was not the victim, assumes the victim C with a telephone call at a place where the place cannot be known, and assumes the victim C with a face-to-face staff, and additionally loans may be extended at the credit rating if he/she has repaid the existing loans.

If a loan is repaid with an account designated by the internal branch and a certificate of repayment is issued to a certified judicial scrivener office, a loan shall be granted at least 10 million won as interest per annum.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, in fact, a person who is not a person who is not a person who is not a person who is not an employee of the lot, and even if he receives money as a repayment for the loan from the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to make additional loans to the victim.

Nevertheless, on December 8, 2016, at around 13:29, from the person who deceivings the victim as such, and then transferred KRW 2,855,580 to the bank account (D) prior to A’s name, and around December 15:39, 2016, KRW 3,100,000 to the bank account (F) in E’s name around 15:39, 2016.

2. The Defendant committed the crime of aiding and abetting the fraud by Defendant A shall pay 5% of the face value of the withdrawal to the Defendant, by delivering the money to the Defendant who withdrawn, although the money would be deposited in the current name account, from the member of the organization that committed the crime of aiding and abetting the fraud as stated in paragraph 1.

“Along with the contact to the purport, accepted the account number of the bank account (D) prior to the Defendant’s name, and notified the account number of the bank account holder. On December 8, 2016, the bank was sent to the sender of the above name in cash prior to the Defendant’s name, 2,116,357 out of the amount of damage deposited from the bank account (D) prior to the Defendant’s name, as described in paragraph 1, from the bank prior to the end of the 123-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-si around that time.

Accordingly, the defendant could easily commit the crime of fraud of the above-mentioned person without a name.

arrow