logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2019.11.29 2019고합269
강간등
Text

The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

Reasons

1. The Defendant, at around 2009, became aware of the fact that he was a volunteer in the Infant Care Center to study the victim B (hereinafter referred to as “victim B”), and then sent a contact to SNS, etc., and became the first victim only for nine years on the day of this case.

Around November 22, 2018, the Defendant contacted the victim with the mobile camera “Kakao Stockholm” to drink alcohol, and became the victim before the “D Hospital” located in Daegu Suwon-gu C around 01:58 on the same day.

The defendant, who was willing to find a drinking house with the victim, boarded the victim on the defendant's vehicle, and moved the door to the Eelto Eel in Busan City and parked the vehicle in the parking lot, and was accommodated in the above Moel F.

The Defendant, along with the victim, she was accommodated in the above telecom Felel room, and she told the victim “snick.” However, the victim refused this, she sought to leave the victim’s arms, she tried to get off the clothes, she was placed on the bend, and she was in “X”, and even though she was sealed by the Defendant, she was divided into body so that she could not have the victim resisted against her arms, and she took off the Defendant’s sexual organ into the part of the victim’s body, and she took the Defendant’s sexual organ into the part of the victim’s body by coercioning her resistance, and she was in the victim’s entrance.

Since then, the Defendant laid down the arms of the victim who was suffering from his place of string down in the toilet, placed them on the bed, put them into the bed, racked against the above methods, put the Defendant’s sexual organ into the bed of the victim, put the victim’s sexual organ into the bed, and put the victim’s sexual organ into the bed.

Accordingly, the Defendant raped the victim.

B. Violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (hereinafter “Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes”), the Defendant, at the same time and at the same place as the preceding paragraph, has the Defendant’s smartphone functioned on a hand room located on the cremation in the victim’s seat, thereby running the Defendant’s smartphone function.

arrow