logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 원주지원 2018.06.22 2018고정106
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 21, 2017, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (drinking) driving a BM5 vehicle under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.064% from the blood alcohol level around 18:50 on Oct. 21, 2017, the Defendant driven a vehicle of approximately 1km from the original State C Drippon to D at the same time, and up to the road front of the entrance of E.

2. Violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) and the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act by driving the same vehicle at the same time as the above “1,” and driving the vehicle at a speed that would make it impossible to identify the road front of the entrance of the E-mail located in D at home.

At that point, the road is one-lane, and the victim F (50 years old, South) was proceeding before G-si left the H (58 years old, South Korea) on the back seat of G-si, and the victim I (5 years old, South Korea), the victim I (55 years old, South Korea), I (5 years old, and L(55 years old, South Korea), and I (5 years old, South Korea), while carrying L (5 years old, South Korea) on the top of the Hastststststa vehicle capacity, the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to accurately operate the steering system, brakes, and other devices of the vehicle and to not drive the vehicle at a speed or in a manner that may cause danger and harm to other persons depending on the traffic situation, structure, and performance of the vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and proceeds as it is, 1) the rear part of the damaged vehicle is shocked, 1) the damaged vehicle is pushed down, 2) the damaged vehicle was pushed down in the future, and 2) the damaged vehicle was driven.

After all, the defendant's above occupational negligence 1), 2) the victim and the knife M, k (2) the victim and the knife K (21 k, knife) and L (5 knife and knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife, and knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knif.

3. The Defendant in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation Act has not subscribed to mandatory insurance at the same time as the above “1” on the road.

arrow