logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.09.14 2016가합568833
부당이득금
Text

1. The Plaintiff:

A. From October 28, 2016 to October 28, 2016, Defendant B shall draw up a map in attached Form 1, among the 576,412,250 won and 371.3 square meters in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The land ownership relationship between the Plaintiff and the Defendant is as shown in the annexed Form 1. The Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D-371.3 square meters (hereinafter “instant land”).

(E) Seocho-gu E large 372.1m2 (hereinafter “instant E”).

) The Seocho-gu Fbubing 410.3 square meters (hereinafter “instant F land”) is the instant F land.

(2) From June 29, 1978, the Plaintiff owned 1/2 shares of the instant land from around June 29, 1978, Defendant B owned the remainder of 1/2 shares of the instant land from around April 15, 199, owned the instant land from around January 22, 198, and at least around October 15, 2006, the instant lease agreement as seen below was concluded.

B. Along on May 18, 190, Defendant B had two floors of neighborhood living facilities in the Busan District District District, Busan District Court Decision 201Da2778, May 18, 1990 (hereinafter “instant building”) on the instant land.

A) A newly built and owned the instant building. Of the instant land, the part 2.2 square meters (hereinafter “the instant land”) connected in sequence to each point of 1, 7, 6, 5, and 1, the attached drawing indication 1, 7, 6, 5, and 1, among the instant land.

(2) Around August 25, 2006, Defendant B, without the Plaintiff’s consent, occupied and used the instant leased land as the site of the instant building. (3) Around October 15, 2006, Defendant B, with the indication of the object of the lease indicated in the attached Table 1, concluded that the instant leased land was leased as five years from October 15, 2006, deposit money KRW 500,000, and rent KRW 25,00,000 from the rent month (as seen below, the said lease is disputed regarding the object of the instant lease; hereinafter the said lease is referred to as “instant lease”). A lease agreement of this case was drafted on October 10, 201, around December 25, 2015, each of the lease agreements was amended and drafted on each of the following terms:

arrow