logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2018.06.29 2018고정375
특수폭행
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A and the victim B are married between husband and wife who reported marriage in 1999.

On November 26, 2017, around 11:00, the Defendant: (a) committed assault on the part of the victim at around 1m in the Jung-gu Daejeon-gu Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, on the ground that the victim, who is the husband, her husband, fuckbucks off the bucks and fucks, carried a tree of about 1m in length; (b) on the part of the victim, the victim was fucks, once, once the left part of the buck, and once the back part of the evidence.

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. A protocol concerning the suspect B of the police;

1. Application of internal investigation reports (on-site conditions, etc. at the time of dispatch) and photographs-related statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Articles 261 and 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment for a crime;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The part dismissing a public prosecution under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act against the order of provisional payment

1. The summary of the facts charged is that Defendant B and the victim A are married to and reported by marriage in 1999.

On November 26, 2017, the Defendant: (a) 11:00 on November 26, 2017, when the victim, who was found in the Jung-gu Daejeon metropolitan residential area, was flicking the head of the victim, was flicking the head of the victim; (b) was flicking the head of the victim; and (c) was flicking the head of the

2. One set of a board, which is a crime falling under Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act, and shall not be prosecuted against the clearly expressed will of the victim under paragraph (3) of the same Article.

According to the public trial records, the victim can recognize the fact that he/she has withdrawn his/her wish to punish the defendant on April 17, 2018, which is after the institution of public prosecution. Thus, the public prosecution is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow