logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2016.10.06 2016고단1517
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a rocketing car.

On March 23, 2016, around 09:10 on March 23, 2016, the Defendant proceeded along a two-lane road in front of Ulsan-gu C in the direction of the public announcement distance along the one-lane distance.

At all times, there was an intersection where signal lights were installed, and the victim D (n, 43 years old) was driving ahead of the same direction, and the Ei 30 car was stopped in accordance with the new code, so there was a duty of care to ensure that the person engaged in driving service is well able to look at the situation and secure a safety distance to avoid when the vehicle stops.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to drive a stroke and operated a stroke in the vicinity of the vehicle at the front section of the said stroke 130 vehicle due to the negligence of driving the stroke stroke stroke stroke stroke stroke stroke stroke stroke stroke stroke s to the rear part of the stroke stroke stroke stroke stroke s

Ultimately, the Defendant by such occupational negligence inflicted injury on the victim D, such as salt sprinks and tensions, on each side, requiring approximately two-day medical treatment on the part of the victim F, on the part of the victim F, and on the part of the victim H (the 48 years old), the victim H (the 48 years old), who was on the top of the truck in need of medical treatment for about two-day period of time, suffered from each injury, such as crums, splates, tensions, etc., and at the same time, the victim I, who is the husband of the above D, suffered about KRW 1,453,307, the above i30 car owned by the victim I, who is the husband of the above D, for approximately 423,50,00 won for repair expenses, and escaped without taking necessary measures, such as providing relief to the victims.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to D or F;

1. The actual survey report and on-site photographs;

1. Application of each written diagnosis and written estimate for vehicles;

1. Relevant provisions concerning facts constituting an offense;

arrow