logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.01.15 2013고정1726
폭행치상
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. On November 24, 2012, the Defendant: (a) around 01:40 on the charge, the Defendant tried to avoid driving the vehicle under the influence of alcohol while the victim D (Nam, 63 years old), the security guards of the said building, transferred the vehicle to another place by the Defendant’s vehicle parked in front of the Seoul Gangnam-gu Seoul building, but was unable to drive the vehicle under the influence of alcohol.

Therefore, the victim continued to demand the movement of the above vehicle, attached the defendant's marking to the defendant, and the defendant neglected to take care of the victim when he rootss the above vehicle, but neglected to do so, the defendant's body and spread the defendant's body and caused the defendant's drinking to faced with the baby of the victim, thereby resulting in the victim's 28-day medical treatment.

2. Determination

A. According to the prosecutor’s evidence and video CDs, the following facts are recognized:

D as security guards of the C building, the vehicle of the defendant parked in front of the C building at the time of the instant case was unable to move out of the other vehicle, and the defendant who was in the drinking house adjacent to the C building was called the deduction of the vehicle by telephone.

The Defendant, upon receiving a telephone, she called D to get off his/her drunk person, because she was under the influence of alcohol, but D said D said D was unable to put him/her to go through the Defendant’s two arms, while she said D said her to have his/her arm’s length cut off.

Accordingly, the Defendant spreaded the attached arms D, and was in line with D's arms during which he was in line with D's arms.

(1) During approximately one minute of video play time, the Defendant entered D into a place where the damage was inflicted, and D put the Defendant’s arms, or prevented them from putting them in front.

B. According to this, even though the defendant tried not to drive a drunkly, D calls for unreasonable deduction of the motor vehicle from the defendant, and sells the defendant.

arrow