logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.10.05 2014고정5799
공중위생관리법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 300,000 won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Any person who intends to run a lodging business shall report to the competent authorities.

The Defendant, without such report, leased 101 multi-household houses in Seodaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and posted an advertisement with the trade name of “D”, “E” and other contents, including “E”, on July 31, 2014, on which the Defendant reported and promised to sell the said site, and run accommodation business, such as receiving accommodation cost of KRW 40,00 and lodging KRW 101.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendant’s partial statement at the 6th trial date, the Defendant posted a string to test the reservation site, and the Defendant was aware only that the reservation would be cancelled upon filing an application for cancellation with the Company. However, the Defendant did not delete from the Company, and thus, FC was made a reservation and find out, and FC had been in Busan, and may do so only a day, and it was possible to do so. This was the first day due to the Defendant’s occurrence of the 6th trial, and the Defendant expressed that FC was given a delivery of 40,000 won directly from FC.

1. A letter of inquiry by the head of Seodaemun-gu;

1. Status of accommodation reservation and building photographing (each screen covering);

1. A copy of the real estate lease contract (No. 101) submitted as evidence the evidence that the Defendant entered into a short-term lease contract and received a sublease fee in the course of operating a lease business under 303 of the same building. However, the indictment of this case was conducted by lodging business under 101, and the indictment of this case does not interfere with each of the above evidence submitted by the Defendant when comprehensively considering each evidence presented in the summary of the evidence.

Rather, the time, purpose, and actual use of the defendant leased and used 101 and 303.

arrow