A person shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not less than six months for each crime of paragraph (2) of the judgment of the defendant.

Paragraph 1 of the judgment against the defendant.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] On October 28, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor and two years of suspended execution, etc. in the Seo-gu District Court Branch of the Daegu District Court on the part of October 28, 2016, and the judgment became final and conclusive on November 5, 2016.

[Criminal facts]

1. On January 30, 2016, the Defendant: (a) driven Cone Star Cargo Vehicles without obtaining a driver’s license in the section of approximately 500 meters from the front of the Daegu Seo-gu, Daegu Seo-gu, and the into the front of the 190 death front road, from the 242 Sejong Seo-gu, Daegu Seo-gu, and the 190-ro, the U.S., Daegu Seo-gu, to the front of the 190 death front road; and (b) on January 30, 2016.

2. A crime committed on May 19, 2017;

A. On May 19, 2017, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (Non-licenseless Driving) driven a D low-speed car without obtaining a driver’s license from approximately 500 meters section from the 500-meter-ro, Seogu, Daegu-gu, to the 56-day road in the Seogdong-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu.

B. On May 19, 2017, the Defendant was driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol by following the Defendant’s 112 report, stating that he/she would drink on the front of his/her main apartment house in front of his/her 56-ro, Seo-gu, Daegu, Seo-gu, 2017, while driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol, as described in paragraph 1, while he/she was driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol on the front of his/her main apartment, as described in paragraph 1, while driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol on the front of his/her main apartment.

Although there are reasonable grounds to determine a person, from 21:05 on the same day to 21:24 on the same day, he/she was requested to respond to the measurement of drinking alcohol by inserting the whole in four times in total, but he/she did not comply with it.

As a result, the defendant did not comply with a police officer's request for alcohol testing without justifiable grounds.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Reports on the detection of drivers in violation of the Traffic Act on roads, reports on the circumstances of drivers in charge, and drivers in charge; and