1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant A: 100,000,000 won;

B. The remaining Defendants are jointly and severally with Defendant A, respectively.

1. Basic facts

A. On August 7, 2007, the Plaintiff (Seoul Mutual Savings Bank: hereinafter “ACI”) entered into a credit transaction agreement with the AC Diplomatic Association (hereinafter “ACI”) to grant a loan of KRW 3 billion at the maturity rate of August 7, 2008, interest rate of KRW 10.5% per annum, and delay compensation rate of KRW 22% per annum. The remaining Defendants except the Defendant Z, other Defendants except the Defendant Z, and the network AA provided a joint and several surety by way of comprehensive collateral guarantee by setting the amount of the above loans as KRW 4.2 billion per annum.

(hereinafter “the first credit transaction agreement of this case” and “the first credit transaction agreement of this case”). B.

On August 30, 2007, the Plaintiff entered into a credit transaction agreement with the AC church on August 30, 2007 with a maturity of KRW 1 billion as the rate of August 30, 2008, interest rate of KRW 8.5% per annum, and delay compensation rate of KRW 22% per annum. On the same day, the remaining Defendants except Defendant Z, other Defendants, and the net AA provided joint and several surety by way of comprehensive collateral guarantee by setting the above loans to the maximum amount of KRW 1.4 billion.

(hereinafter referred to as “the second credit transaction agreement” and “the second credit transaction agreement of this case” and “the second credit transaction agreement of this case” respectively, and “the instant credit transaction agreement” and “the instant credit transaction guarantee agreement”).

around August 7, 2008, the AC Diplomatic Association prepared and delivered to the Plaintiff an application for extension of the due date of the instant loan to the effect that the due date for the instant loan was changed to August 7, 2009, and each application for extension of the due date for the instant secondary loan was made on August 30, 2009, and each written application for extension of the due date was signed and sealed by Defendant A, and each of the above applications for extension of the due date was signed and sealed by Defendant B, D, F, H (former I), J, K, M, M, M, Q, Q, T, M, U, X, X, Y, and network AA’s signature and seal affixed thereto.

(hereinafter “Application for Extension of Due Date of Credit”) D.

AC school shall file an application with the Plaintiff for extension of the due date for the first loan of this case to August 7, 2010. The due date for the second loan of this case shall be August 30, 2010.