logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2018.07.12 2017나60205
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

purport.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of this court citing the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows, except where the following judgments are added to the fourth and second parts of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is acceptable to accept them according to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

The Plaintiff sought consolation money for mental distress caused by the Defendant’s refusal to accept the Plaintiff’s request for review, and thus, even if the Plaintiff’s request for review was not accepted after the instant disciplinary action, as long as the instant disciplinary action was confirmed to be null and void and the amount of wages was compensated from November 4, 2008 to April 3, 2013, which was the date of the disciplinary action, by the Plaintiff and the Defendant’s labor relationship, as long as the Plaintiff was compensated for the amount equivalent to the wages from November 4, 2008, which was the date of the instant disciplinary action, to April 3, 2013, it is difficult to deem that the Plaintiff was suffering from irrecoverable mental distress

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow