(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2016.02.02 2015고단2626

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2016.02.02 2015고단2626

교통사고처리특례법위반

Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a low-priced car.

On August 6, 2015, the Defendant driven the above car on August 23:25, 2015, and turned to the left at the shopping center in the direction of the shopping center while driving the distance prior to the foreign exchange bank located in 97 in Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, along a three-lane distance from the direction of the intersection to the intersection.

Since there is a remote distance in which a signal is installed, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by driving safely, such as checking the traffic signal well, driving in accordance with the traffic signals and accurately manipulating the steering and steering gear.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected to turn to the left as it was due to the negligence of failing to turn to the left, and received the left side of the Defendant’s vehicle from the left side of the victim C (17 e.g., Seoul) who was driving in the direction of an annual intersection from the direction of an annual scar in accordance with the Mad Green Credit.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered, by such occupational negligence, injury to the victim C, such as fingers and damage to the power lines, etc. in need of approximately 3 weeks of treatment, and injury to the victim E (V, 18 years of age) who was on the back of the damaged urine, such as a thring of the upper half of the upper half of the 8 weeks of treatment, and the victim F (V, 18 years of age) in need of approximately 20 weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. C’s statement;

1. A report on traffic accidents and a survey report on actual condition;

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. Each photograph;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal accidents (on-site investigations and CCTV verification);

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents under the relevant Act concerning criminal facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Article 62 of the Criminal Act:

참조조문

유사 판례

-서울서부지방법원 2021.02.18 2020고단3269

-수원지방법원 2016.07.06 2016고단1539

-대전지방법원 공주지원 2016.04.29 2015고단371

-대구지방법원 2016.03.31 2016고단234

-의정부지방법원 2021.01.12 2020고단5094