1. The defendant shall pay 375,450,000 won to the plaintiff.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

3.Paragraph 1.

1. Comprehensively taking into account the overall purport of the pleadings as to the grounds for the claim Nos. 1 and 2, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with the Defendant on January 13, 2014, each of which was set forth on a deposit of 101.26 square meters on the first floor in the multi-family house located in Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, with the Defendant for KRW 350 million, monthly rent of KRW 250,000 (after February 26, 2014), and the period from February 26, 2014 to February 26, 2016; the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with the Defendant for KRW 380 million, monthly rent of KRW 350,000,000, monthly rent of KRW 350,000, and from February 27, 2016 to February 26, 2018.

According to the above facts, since the above lease contract was terminated on February 26, 2018, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff KRW 4550,000,000,000,000, which is calculated by deducting the amount of money (=350,000 won x 13 months) paid to the plaintiff as unjust enrichment (=375,5450,000 won x 13 months).

2. The defendant's assertion that the plaintiff is obligated to pay the unpaid rent from March 2018. However, even if the plaintiff acted as a claim to deduct unjust enrichment equivalent to the rent from the deposit, there is no evidence to prove that the amount to be deducted exceeds the above 4.55 million won as the plaintiff is the plaintiff, and the above argument by the defendant is without merit.

Although the defendant asserts that the plaintiff is obligated to restore the above house to its original state by destroying it, there is no evidence to acknowledge it, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. The plaintiff's claim is accepted on the ground of the reasoning.