beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Details of the disposition;
A. From August 18, 2008, the Plaintiff served as the director in charge of rehabilitation of the B convalescent.
On May 28, 2012, the Plaintiff was a legal holiday and worked at a ambal event site. At around 16:00, the two copies were serious, and there was a fall in food, clothing, and the left-hand paralysis in the middle of the event site and in the middle of returning home at around 16:0, the Plaintiff was diagnosed by the hospital “in the case of the instant injury” (hereinafter referred to as “the instant injury”).
B. On June 27, 2012, the Plaintiff filed an application for medical care benefits with respect to the instant injury and disease. However, on September 3, 2012, the Defendant rejected the application (hereinafter “instant disposition”) with the Plaintiff on the ground that “The Defendant: (a) on September 3, 2012, the Defendant: (b) applied for medical care benefits for the instant injury and disease; (c) the applicant is highly likely to cause cerebrovascular in the nature of the disease due to diseases originally owned by the applicant; and (d) excessive amount of medical care at a reasonable level directly likely to cause cerebrscular; and (d) the applicant’s injury and disease is not recognized as proximate
[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap 2, and 4
2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful
A. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1) The Plaintiff was in charge of mixing 60 patients more than 40 general standards, and did not stop on Saturdays and legal holidays, and the patients with rehabilitation hospitals were treated as outpatients from time to time, and lived in a tension with the hospital by taking out from time to time at night and on holidays. (ii) The Plaintiff applied for one leave per year for one week from May 18, 201 to 25 of the same month, but the Plaintiff’s husband and his family were dismissed due to the hospital’s reasons, and eventually, the Plaintiff’s husband and his family left the leave, and left the Plaintiff’s her husband and the Plaintiff’s remaining work, resulting in a extreme burden and mental burden.