beta
Text
The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the above judgment shall be publicly notified.
Reasons
1. The summary of the facts charged is that: (a) the Defendant: (b) leased “D”, a multi-household building (total 26 units) in Daejeon-gu, Daejeon-gu, to E with the owner of the said multi-household building (total 26 units); (c) entered into a annual contract with the child under the name of the Defendant; and (d) paid three million won per house to E with the child under the name of the Defendant in accordance with the said agreement; and (c) enter into a lease contract with the child under the name of E while carrying out the management work with the child’s profit; (d) concluded a lease contract with the child on March 21, 2011 in the name of E with the said D 401; and (e) obtained the said D 30 million won from F under the name of the deposit money and acquired it under the name of the deposit money, and (e) continued to be punished by imprisonment with prison labor on July 3, 2014 in the appellate court.
Nevertheless, the Defendant brought a civil lawsuit against D owner E seeking the return of the above lease deposit, and the Defendant testified as if the lease contract for the instant D 401 entered into with F without permission of E without permission of E to allow F to return the deposit amount of KRW 30 million from E.
Therefore, on September 2, 2014, the Defendant appeared as a witness of the claim for the lease deposit between the above court 2014Da10493, Plaintiff F and Defendant E at the Daejeon District Court located in Seo-gu, Daejeon, Daejeon, Daejeon, on September 2, 2014, and testified as follows: “I have the honor to accept this contract with the delegation of authority from Defendant E when preparing the lease contract, what is the reason why I stated in the lessor column E” in the examination of the Plaintiff’s legal representative, “I have the honor to accept this contract with the delegation of authority from Defendant E” and had the legitimate authority to conclude the lease contract on behalf of E.
However, the facts are.