logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2017.04.27 2017고단240
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of Crain cars.

On December 24, 2016, at around 07:22, the Defendant: (a) got off the intersection of an elementary school on the upper day of Gangdong-gu Seoul, Seoul, 1477, and (b) got off from the north-dong to the lower-west viewing room, and (c) had a pedestrian signal on the part of the victim D ( South, 38 years old) who was walking the crosswalk pursuant to the pedestrian signals due to the occupational negligence of driving the crosswalk in the course of driving the crosswalk, and caused the victim to suffer bodily injury, such as the upper end part of the 12 weeks of the said radar car, which requires approximately 12 weeks medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The actual investigation report on traffic accidents;

1. A written statement on the occurrence of a traffic accident (D);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 9 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of imprisonment without prison labor for a crime;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution is that the defendant sufficient enough to ensure pedestrian safety by negligence in violation of the signal, and that there is a significant and significant reason for negligence and the degree of injury to the victim, and that there is no criminal history beyond a fine, and that there is no consensus with the victim, the punishment as set forth in the order shall be determined by considering the favorable standing circumstances.

arrow