(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.01.06 2015고단5554

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.01.06 2015고단5554

교통사고처리특례법위반

Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for not less than five months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in the duty of driving the KS5 taxi.

On July 12, 2015, at around 15:29, the Defendant had a duty of care to safely operate the signal in accordance with the direction of the signal and prevent the accident from occurring on the part of a person who is engaged in driving at an intersection through an intersection where a signal, etc. is installed.

However, the Defendant neglected this and neglected to turn to the left at the front left, and led the victim C's D's "Ssprink" vehicle that was driven by the victim C's string of the three-lane two-lanes from the front string of the front string of the front string of the front string of the front string.

As a result, the Defendant suffered, by such occupational negligence, injury to the victim E, such as “satise chills and tensions,” which requires approximately 2 weeks of treatment, and injury to the victim E, which requires approximately 12 weeks of treatment. In addition, the Defendant suffered from the victim F, such as “malute chills and tensions,” which require approximately 12 weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Written statements of C, E, and F;

1. A survey report on actual conditions;

1. Each photograph;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of a credit cooperative without prison labor for punishment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution ( normal consideration, such as the violation of the law, the fact that the taxi operated by the defendant is admitted to the mutual aid association, the fact that the taxi operated by the defendant is admitted to the mutual aid association and the victim F

참조조문

유사 판례

-서울중앙지방법원 2017.10.18 2017고단5888

-부산지방법원 2018.05.16 2018고단597

-서울중앙지방법원 2016.01.19 2015고정4682

-청주지방법원 2021.02.09 2020고단2092

-대전지방법원 2018.11.22 2018고단2788