A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

On June 6, 2019, at around 23:25, the Defendant driven an E rocketing car under the influence of alcohol level of about 15 km without obtaining a driver’s license from the front of the C cafeteria located in the Donan-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Seoul to the front of the Defendant’s dwelling in the same Donan-gun.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The circumstantial statement of the employee;

1. The ledger of driver's licenses;

1. Details of disposition for cancellation of driver's license;

1. Previous records: Criminal records, previous records, results of confirmation of dispositions and reports, and application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (verification of identical records A of a suspect);

1. Article 148-2 (2) 1 and Article 44 (1) of the former Road Traffic Act (Amended by Act No. 16037, Dec. 24, 2018); Article 152 subparagraph 1 and Article 43 of the Road Traffic Act concerning the crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. On July 28, 2006, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of five months for the reason of sentencing under Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation. On June 18, 2010, the Gwangju District Court rendered a summary order of KRW 1.5 million for the crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act at the wooden Branch of the Gwangju District Court, which was sentenced to a summary order of KRW 5 million for a fine of KRW 1.5 million for the crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act, and on March 20, 2019 for a summary order of KRW 5 million for the crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act, respectively.

Considering the fact that the license of the Defendant was revoked due to the Defendant’s identical power and the refusal of the above alcohol measurement, the blood alcohol concentration is considerably high, the driving distance is 15 km, and the driving distance was at 15 km, and the Defendant’s act was not aware of the occurrence of contact with the occurrence of an accident after the start of operation, it is difficult to exclude the possibility of recidivism as well as the risk of recidivism.

The fact that the defendant's mistake and reflects the defendant, and that there is a family member who should look about the defendant.