The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. According to CCTV images taken by the Defendant, as stated in the facts charged, where the Defendant shocked the damaged (hereinafter “the instant accident”), the gist of the grounds for appeal is as follows: (a) the Defendant did not verify whether the Defendant was a victim of the crosswalk; and (b) did not check whether the Defendant was a victim of the crosswalk at the time of entering the crosswalk; and (c) shocked the victim of the crosswalk at the time of entering the crosswalk by negligence.

In addition, while one victim was standing a crosswalk, the defendant's vehicle in contact with the victim's arms and side gates.

In full view of the facts stated in the judgment of the court below, the defendant led to the confession of the facts charged in this case, and the victim was diagnosed with the light of the light of the cryp and the cryp, etc. after the accident in this case.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below that acquitted the defendant is erroneous and adversely affected by the conclusion of the judgment.

2. In light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court, the lower court determined that the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone proves that the victim suffered injury identical to the facts charged by occupational negligence, such as the Defendant’s charges, without any reasonable doubt.

It is difficult to see that there is no other evidence to acknowledge this, and the defendant was acquitted of the facts charged in this case.

A. The Defendant: (a) temporarily stopped on the edge of a crosswalk installed at the entrance of the right side of the road to the right side of the road stated in the facts charged, but attempted to have a mother on the opposite side of the crosswalk enter the crosswalk at the roadway; and (b) was a very slowly slowly driven.

B. According to CCTV images installed on the above sexual party, the victim seems to have opened the above crosswalk on the right side of the defendant's vehicle and the vehicle of the defendant's person entered the crosswalk, and to have opened the vehicle of the defendant's person by hand.