A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] On July 2, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for habitual special larceny at the Cheongju District Court (hereinafter “Cheongju District Court”) and was released on February 29, 2016 and passed on May 2, 2016 during the execution of the sentence.

[2] On July 3, 2017, around 02:10 on July 3, 2017, the Defendant: (a) intruded the Victim E, which was operated by the victim E, in a non-discrimined manner; and (b) stolen the Defendant with approximately KRW 300,000, total amount of KRW 10,000 in cash on Schlage B and in a small room.

Summary of Evidence

【Criminal Facts】

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Some statements made to the accused in the protocol of interrogation of the suspect against the prosecution;

1. Partial statement concerning the suspect interrogation protocol of each police officer against the accused;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. Investigative report (the reason why the person is suspected of being identified and the reason why the person is suspected of committing the crime), internal investigation report (the reason why the person is specified as the suspect A), investigation report (the reason why the person is suspected of being suspected of committing the crime), investigation report (the reason why the person is suspected of being suspected of being suspected of being found), investigation report (Attachment of a report on the investigation report to be attached to the country and water scam scam scam scam scamsscams, etc.), investigation report

1. A legal safety appraisal report;

1. CCTV video CDs;

1. Explanation of each photograph, CCTV photograph, CCTV closure photograph and field photograph (the record of the crime as indicated in the judgment);

1. Written inquiry about criminal history, etc. (A);

1. Copy of the judgment;

1. Status of acceptance by each individual (the defendant and his defense counsel) (the defendant and his defense counsel set up the U.S. P. on the front of the F.M.M. on the road in the criminal facts stated in the judgment of the defendant and set up the vehicle in front of the said Schlage and enter the left alley of the said Schlage.

Along with the fact that the tobacco was avoided, it is argued that there is no fact that the money was stolen by intrusion into the above Schlage.

However, according to the detailed and consistent statements of the victim and CCTV images, a man (the face is not identified) recorded in CCTV is F.