The plaintiffs' respective claims against the primary defendants and each claims against the primary defendants of Gyeonggi-do.

1. Basic facts

A. The instant fund creation and the status of the parties 1) The Financial Investment Services and Capital Markets Act (hereinafter “Capital Markets Act”).

(C) Asia Asset Management Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “ASEAN Asset Management”) which is a collective investment business entity under

on December 6, 2010, Korea Securities Finance Corporation (hereinafter “Korea Securities Finance Corporation”) which is a trust business entity, is called Korea Securities Finance Corporation.

B) Between the Fund and the Fund, the “Arymsung Real Estate Investment Trust” (hereinafter “instant investment trust”) is the Fund.

(2) The trust agreement of this case (hereinafter referred to as the “instant trust agreement”) with the content of setting up

2) The Fund is a private real estate fund, and the Fund issued beneficiary certificates (collective investment securities) of KRW 272.5 billion and sold them to the beneficiary (collective investors). The Fund purchased the first apartment unsold in lots 399 households (hereinafter “instant apartment”) with the price for the sale of the first apartment unsold in Sung-dong in Suwon-si, which was built in Sung-si, Suwon-si. The Fund is a structure that sells this to the beneficiary and distributes the proceeds therefrom to the beneficiary.

On the other hand, the Asia Asset Management and the Korea Securities Finance created, respectively, a collective investment scheme in relation to the unsold apartment unit (hereinafter “Japanese Private Equity Real Estate Investment Trust”), which is a collective investment scheme, in relation to the housing unsold in lots (hereinafter “Japan apartment”), which was constructed by the Handog-dong Meal, in the same structure as the instant fund, in order for the managers of the land constructed in Hando-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-si (hereinafter “

3. On October 31, 2013, Plaintiff SIE purchased beneficiary certificates from Plaintiff SIE, the first beneficiary of the Fund, and then transferred them to Plaintiff SIE again on December 5, 2013, Plaintiff SIE, thereby finalizing Plaintiff SIE’s status as beneficiary of the Fund.