The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendant did not escape immediately after the instant case, but did not have any intention to commit an escape.

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (one million won by fine) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. Determination of misunderstanding of facts and misapprehension of legal principles as to the assertion of facts and "when the driver of the accident runs away without taking measures under Article 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, such as aiding the victim or aiding the victim although the driver of the accident knew that the victim was killed due to the accident," refers to a situation where it brings about a situation in which it is impossible to identify the person who caused the accident because the driver of the accident escaped from the accident site before performing his/her duty under Article 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, such as aiding the victim although he/she knew that the victim was killed due to the accident, and thus, if the driver of the accident escaped from the accident site before he/she performed his/her duty under Article 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, such as aiding the victim although he/she was aware of the fact that the victim was killed, he/she should not take measures under Article 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act such as aiding the victim and aiding the victim, and even if the driver of the accident was actually under his/her control prior to rescue the victim's.