The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal presented an argument about mistake of facts or misapprehension of legal principles in the statement of grounds for appeal, but withdrawn from the date of the first instance trial.

The sentence of the court below (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination is based on the following facts: (a) the Defendant was found to have made a mistake late in the trial; and (b) the Defendant appears to have reached the instant crime due to the management deterioration of F that the Defendant operated; (c) however, the value of the radio relay meter supplied by the Defendant is not significant; (d) the Defendant installed the above radio relay meter in the Myeon Office, etc., did not pay goods to the victim even though the Defendant received the price; (e) did not pay goods to the victim; and (e) the circumstance in which the Defendant actively endeavored to recover damage was not observed; and (e) did not reach an agreement with the victim; and (e) the Defendant did not reach an agreement, and all the sentencing conditions indicated in the instant records and arguments, such as the Defendant’s age, environment, background, means, and consequence of the instant crime, and the circumstances after the crime

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.