1. The Defendant’s decision on performance recommendation is based on the Seoul Southern District Court Decision 2012Gaso74098 dated June 28, 2012.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a company that operates photographing and prize competition business, and the Defendant is a company that runs web hosting and wholesale business.

B. On December 12, 2016, the Plaintiff awarded a contract to the Defendant for the production of the Plaintiff’s website (hereinafter “instant website”) between the Defendant and the Defendant, setting the price of KRW 12 million. Around that time, the Plaintiff paid KRW 6 million to the Defendant the retainer amount set forth in the contract, and the contents of the said contract (hereinafter “instant contract”) are as follows.

On December 12, 2016, from December 12 to February 3, 2016, 2016, the payment for free subsidization of the domain name information D hosting information C for one year: KRW 6 million (excluding value-added tax within 2 days after the conclusion of the contract): Article 1 (Scope of Production) of the 6 million (within 5 days after the completion of the web-site inspection) (1) of the 600,000 won (within 5 days after the web-site inspection) (1) of the 100,000 won (within 5 days after the web-site inspection) (the scope of production) of the web-site consisting of the contents of the Plaintiff’s introduction and web-site (based on the calculation of the production period) of the measures for web-rating services of the server for the domain name. (1) The date of commencement of production shall be determined on the day following the date of deposit, and the entire production schedule shall

(2) When the provision of content data is delayed, the whole schedule shall be re- coordinated through consultation between the plaintiff and the defendant.

(3) The whole schedule shall be re- coordinated upon consultation between the plaintiff and the defendant in accordance with the confirmation of the domains.

(4) Where the service of this case is delayed until the date of production due to any other reason, the plaintiff and the defendant may adjust the schedule through mutual consultation.

Article 5 (Examination) (1) The period of production and examination of the homepage shall run by setting a separate period after completion of production.

(2) Matters to be corrected or supplemented through inspection on the website shall be notified to the defendant, and the defendant shall promptly deal with the requested matters by the plaintiff.

Article 6 (Payment Method of Services Price) (1) Transactions between the parties shall be made cash resolution.

(2) The defendant shall open the homepage after the payment of balance has been completed.