logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2015.11.18 2015고단822
강제추행
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 13, 2015, around 21:20 on July 13, 2015, the Defendant: (a) followed the victim E (here, 19 years of age) who was living in front of the D gas station in Kimcheon-si C, and subsequently committed an indecent act by force against the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. A written statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (including photographs attached thereto);

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Article 298 of the Criminal Act (Selection of Fine: Considerations, etc.: The fact that the defendant acknowledges the crime of this case and repents his mistake, that the victim is the front offender by mutual consent with the victim, that the defendant is the first offender who has no record of criminal punishment until this system, etc.);

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The main sentence of Article 16 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes committed;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

1. In full view of all the circumstances, including the benefits expected by the disclosure order or notification order and the effectiveness of the prevention, disadvantages and side effects, etc. of the Defendant’s personal information disclosure and notification order, it is difficult to conclude that the Defendant’s personal information is likely to be disclosed and notified to the public, under the proviso to Article 47(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes, Article 49(1) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse, Article 49(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes, and Article 50(1) proviso of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse [it is difficult to conclude that the Defendant has no record of punishment for sexual crimes prior to the crime in this case prior to the crime in this case, and the Defendant’s mistake in the crime in this case appears to have been divided into the crime in this case, and all the circumstances such as

arrow